Generating a bash script for that would look something like this: qtox -c acme-lib -e pep8 mypy -c acme-rest-api -e pep8 mypy -c acme-lib -e pytest -c acme-rest-api -e pytest > retox.sh Simply run all of the Tox tests together, starting with Flake 8 and MyPy If you're working on both at the same time, you may want to One is called acme-lib, and is a reusable library containing coreīusiness logic, while the other is acme-rest-api, which usesĪcme-lib. Say you have two directories containing two Python projects, both using Use the -c flag to specify a tox directory, then use -e like normal. Qtox also supports creating bash scripts for multiple tox projects. You'll have to wait for them to finish before seeing feedback from If you instead put the longer running jobs first, It's up to you to make sure the simpler jobs are put earlier in the list To scroll back up to see what went wrong. This keeps things simpler so you don't have If a job fails, all other subsequent jobs are simply killed without Reads from the start of the file and follows it until the process When it's time toĬonsume the results of that job, tail is invoked in another job, which It does this by having every job redirect to a file. The interim will be shown before it's current output is displayed, etc. Happens, and when black finishes all of flake8's output that happened in So in this example, blacks output would be seen as it Jobs- such as black or flake8- to run first).Īs it works it's way through the list, it shows the output of each job The results in the order you specified (meaning you want the quicker When this script will instantly launch five jobs in parallel and wait on Qtox can be used to create a bash script like so: qtox -e black pep8 mypy p圓5 p36 > retox.sh The ability to re-run it's commands faster. qtox doesn't replace Tox, it just lets you augment it with Or if they should be checked for in the Tox's whitelist_externals Qtox to determine if command line tools are present in the virtualenv's Note: tox needs to run one time before qtox can be used, in order for The best solution is to just run everything as often as possible. Of type errors after they're convinced they've already made their However, because MyPy checks are often put in separate toxĮnvironment, it's easy for people focused on a different problem (say,įixing a unit test) to run only those environments for minutes or hoursīefore they remember to check MyPy, and be left needing to fix a bunch
Offer the most value when they're run continuously as development Invoking Tox compared to manually crafting scripts. MyPy exacerbate the problems I see running The rise of truly amazing static analysis tools in Python such as Tox.ini file and often became out of date. These scripts obviously duplicated information already found in the Scripts to run the Tox commands and used that instead of Tox, whichĪlways ended up being faster according to The speed savings were significant enough that I ended up writing Bash tox/py27/bin/pytest mypkg) versus when I invoked Tox directly I simply ran a command in the virtualenv tox set up (say, Anecdotally, I've always noticed a huge speed improvement when Tox appears to do a lot of house work before running even the simplestĬommands. Tox is great for making sure tests run a truly isolated environment on aĬI platform, but if you're just trying to run flake8 or the unit testsįor the hundredth time today it can be overkill. Why you shouldn't call Tox from your dev box Osx call gtail instead of tail for this reason.
Need to install it with brew install coreutils. The version of tail on OSX doesn't have the -pid option, so you'll